[c-nsp] IEEE standards
Adam Crosby
acrosby at nps.k12.va.us
Thu Mar 23 17:40:40 EST 2006
We're using LACP (it's still called etherchannel in the configs, it's
just LACP instead of PAGP) between Cisco 4500's and 3Com gear. Works
fine in Active mode (haven't done much testing with any other). VLAN
trunking across it works as well (with dot1q encap, of course).
Bundle status change causes about second of packet loss (not enough to
disrupt any sessions) and then the link is back up and running.
-
Adam
>>> "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org> 3/23/2006 4:30:48 PM >>>
Is anyone using LACP rather then Etherchannel and LLDP rather then CDP
on Cisco devices?
TIA
Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list