[c-nsp] OSPF Cost vs Injected Default Route

[a. Rahman Isnaini R suTan]

Sven,


The primary link we found totally down (from bad qualities).
Does OSPF have the parameter in related to latency/number of time out so we 
can manipulate routing using them ?
I meant if the link in bad qualities so latency/timed out would increase 
then the best path move to another good link ?

I read about EIGRP... but never implement it regarding the delay paramater 
in choising a best path.

Salam,
a. Rahman Isnaini r. Sutan



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <sven.cisco-nsp at huster.me.uk>
To: "a. Rahman Isnaini R suTan" <risnaini at indo.net.id>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Cost vs Injected Default Route


>* a. Rahman Isnaini R suTan <risnaini at indo.net.id> [2006-03-23 18:54:27 
>+0700]:
>
>> Dear Oliver & All,
>>
>>
>> Let say 3 routers A, B and C running OSPF.
>> A is ASBR, connected to B and C
>> C connected to A directly & via B.
>>
>> For router C which connected with two links :
>>     - Primary (w/ default route injected from A)
>>     - Secondary (w/ static default route + metric >110 to B)
>>
>> In case of bad quality of primary link (not fully disconnected), I set 
>> cost
>> 5000 on interface router A towards C.
>> The default route changed to secondary.
>>
>> How cost can affect the changing of default route ?
>
> So what does 'sh ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0' say in that case?
>
> Does it really discard the OSPF learned route and use the static or is 
> just
> your path selection so that the next-hop for your learned default is now
> router B?
>
> Cheers
> Sven
>
>
>