[c-nsp] C7304 and OSPF

[Palis Michalis]

Yes... All an the same subnet... I am starting to thinking that it is a bug 
of the IOS beacuse we have other C7304 with same IOS that are running on 
other networks but with less load... Of course 40Mg is not considered  a lot 
of load....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aivars" <aivars at ml.lv>
To: "Palis Michalis" <security at cytanet.com.cy>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] C7304 and OSPF


> Are they all in one subnet?
>
> Aivars
>
> Friday, March 24, 2006, 7:56:21 AM, you wrote:
>
> PM> Hello all
>
> PM> We have a few Cisco7304 and despite all other problems we are
> PM> facing with PXF, we are having problems with unstable ospf. We are
> PM> having two of them in a an enviroment where we have several C7401
> PM> , C7609 and C7513. The ospf of 7340 whith the other routers is
> PM> very untable while the OPSF between all the other router in the
> PM> network is OK. All routers are in the same area. C7304 have two
> PM> Interfaces,one GE and one FE. Problem is on the GE side. GE has
> PM> about 45Megs of traffic. IOS that we are currently running is
> PM> :c7300-js-mz.122-20.S8.bin. We did try several IOS for the C7304
> PM> but all are having their unique problems.
>
>>>From debuging it seems that the C7304 is not processing the OSPF hellos 
>>>it receives from the neighbor. The remote neighbor stays in the INIT 
>>>state. The strange thing is that it does not loose all its neighbors at 
>>>the same time.. It may loose some of them and after a while some other at 
>>>random...
>
>
> PM> Mar 24 05:26:13 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.141 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 05:33:13 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.151 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 05:51:13 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.129 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 05:57:13 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.140 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 05:59:33 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.136 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 06:23:53 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, x.x.x.142 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 06:25:33 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.7 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 06:26:48 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.158 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
> PM> Mar 24 06:27:53 EET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.140 on
> PM> GigabitEthernet0/0 from 2WAY to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Dead timer 
> expired
>
> PM> Ay idea?
> PM> _______________________________________________
> PM> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> PM> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> PM> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>