[c-nsp] BGP best path
Mikisa Richard
rmikisa at bushnet.net
Tue May 2 10:26:21 EDT 2006
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
>Could this be a routing recursion? BGP next-hop 64.152.195.33 learnt via
>BGP? What is the 64.152.195.33 address? Can you use next-hop-self on the
>neighbor peering with AS23549?
>
> oli
>
>
>
telia(AS1299)----------BUSH-UPLINK(AS29032)-------------UPLINK(29032)------------Customer(AS23549)
213.248.97.89 217.212.242.1
217.212.242.2 64.152.195.33
That's the lay out. The session between 217.212.242.2 and the customer
(64.152.195.33) seems ok ..
UPLINK#show ip bgp nei 64.152.195.33 ro
BGP table version is 309, local router ID is 217.212.243.253
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 63.103.129.0/24 64.152.195.33 0 0 23549 i
*> 64.152.195.0/24 64.152.195.33 0 0 23549 i
Total number of prefixes 2
Then the UPLINK ( 217.212.242.2) does iBGP with 217.212.242.1...
UPLINK#show ip bgp neighbors 217.212.243.254 ad
BGP table version is 316, local router ID is 217.212.243.253
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 41.220.0.0/20 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
*> 41.220.1.0/26 217.212.242.23 0 32768 ?
*> 41.220.13.0/24 217.212.242.14 0 32768 ?
*> 41.220.14.0/23 217.212.242.13 0 32768 ?
*> 63.103.129.0/24 64.152.195.33 0 0 23549 i
*> 64.152.195.0/24 64.152.195.33 0 0 23549 i
*> 64.152.195.33/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
and ....
BUSH-UPLINK-01#show ip bgp ne 217.212.242.2 ro
BGP table version is 558467, local router ID is 217.212.243.254
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* i41.220.0.0/20 217.212.242.2 0 100 0 i
*>i41.220.13.0/24 217.212.242.14 0 100 0 ?
*>i41.220.14.0/23 217.212.242.13 0 100 0 ?
* i63.103.129.0/24 64.152.195.33 0 100 0 23549 i
* i64.152.195.0/24 64.152.195.33 0 100 0 23549 i
Total number of prefixes 5
Hopefully that makes more sense.
--
Richard
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list