[c-nsp] STP funnies - moving from forwarding to forwarding

Marko Milivojevic markom at pangalactic.net
Wed May 10 14:17:37 EDT 2006


Do you have portfast configured on these ports?

Dale W. Carder wrote:
> Thus spake Daniel Roesen (dr at cluenet.de) on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:23:53PM +0200:
>> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:13:07PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>>> %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Gi4/1 instance 100 moving from
>>> forwarding to forwarding
>> Nobody ever seen that happening?
> 
> Ok, now you made me look...
> 
> I see that message coming from 6500's only.  These are running                            
> SXE2.  Here's a sample "transaction" when that message seems                            
> to occur.  In this example, fa7/43 bounces and the message 
> from the other ports on that vlan occur.
> 
> May 10 12:11:13 switch-23 12766: May 10 12:11:12: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet7/43, changed state to down
> May 10 12:11:14 switch-23 12767: May 10 12:11:12: %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Fa7/43 instance 632 moving from forwarding to disabled
> May 10 12:11:51 switch-23 12768: May 10 12:11:51: %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Fa7/33 instance 632 moving from forwarding to forwarding
> May 10 12:11:51 switch-23 12769: May 10 12:11:51: %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Fa7/34 instance 632 moving from forwarding to forwarding
> May 10 12:11:51 switch-23 12770: May 10 12:11:51: %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Fa7/44 instance 632 moving from forwarding to forwarding
> May 10 12:11:51 switch-23 12771: May 10 12:11:51: %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Gi8/1 instance 632 moving from forwarding to forwarding
> May 10 12:11:51 switch-23 12772: May 10 12:11:51: %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Gi8/2 instance 632 moving from forwarding to forwarding
> May 10 12:11:51 switch-23 12773: May 10 12:11:51: %SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE: Port Fa9/2 instance 632 moving from forwarding to forwarding
> May 10 12:11:51 switch-23 12774: May 10 12:11:51: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet7/43, changed state to up
> 
> 
> It must not mean anything bad, because I set SEC to ignore it 
> over a year ago:
> 
> # Stupid STP message from 6500's
> type=Suppress
> ptype=RegExp
> pattern=SPANTREE-SP-6-PORT_STATE.+from forwarding to forwarding
> 
> 
> :-)
> 
> Dale
> 
> -----------------------------------
> Dale W. Carder - Network Engineer   
> University of Wisconsin at Madison  
> http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~dwcarder
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list