[c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration

neil at colt.net neil at colt.net
Thu Nov 16 04:58:00 EST 2006


Hello,
For reference from a couple of boxes we have:

system power redundancy mode = redundant
system power total =     3830.40 Watts (91.20 Amps @ 42V)
system power used =      2289.00 Watts (54.50 Amps @ 42V)
system power available = 1541.40 Watts (36.70 Amps @ 42V)
                        Power-Capacity PS-Fan Output Oper
PS   Type               Watts   A @42V Status Status State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------ ------ -----
1    WS-CAC-4000W-INT   3830.40 91.20  OK     OK     on 
2    WS-CAC-4000W-INT   3830.40 91.20  OK     OK     on 
                        Pwr-Allocated  Oper
Fan  Type               Watts   A @42V State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ -----
1    FAN-MOD-9           241.50  5.75  OK
2    FAN-MOD-9           241.50  5.75  OK
                        Pwr-Requested  Pwr-Allocated  Admin Oper
Slot Card-Type          Watts   A @42V Watts   A @42V State State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ----- -----
1    OSM-2+4GE-WAN+      213.36  5.08   213.36  5.08  on    on
2    OSM-2+4GE-WAN+      213.36  5.08   213.36  5.08  on    on
3    WS-X6582-2PA        105.00  2.50   105.00  2.50  on    on
4    OSM-1CHOC12/T3-SI   184.80  4.40   184.80  4.40  on    on
5    WS-SUP720-3BXL      328.44  7.82   328.44  7.82  on    on
6    WS-SUP720-3BXL      328.44  7.82   328.44  7.82  on    on
7    WS-X6582-2PA        105.00  2.50   105.00  2.50  on    on
8    OSM-8OC3-POS-SI+    142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  on    on
9    OSM-1CHOC12/T3-SI   184.80  4.40   184.80  4.40  on    on

For reference From one of our more loaded boxes

And from another 6509

system power redundancy mode = redundant
system power total =     2331.00 Watts (55.50 Amps @ 42V)
system power used =      1272.60 Watts (30.30 Amps @ 42V)
system power available = 1058.40 Watts (25.20 Amps @ 42V)
                        Power-Capacity PS-Fan Output Oper
PS   Type               Watts   A @42V Status Status State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------ ------ -----
1    WS-CAC-2500W       2331.00 55.50  OK     OK     on 
2    WS-CAC-2500W       2331.00 55.50  OK     OK     on 
                        Pwr-Requested  Pwr-Allocated  Admin Oper
Slot Card-Type          Watts   A @42V Watts   A @42V State State
---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ----- -----
1    WS-X6516-GBIC       142.80  3.40   142.80  3.40  on    on
2    WS-SVC-FWM-1        171.78  4.09   171.78  4.09  on    on
3    WS-X6348-RJ-45      100.38  2.39   100.38  2.39  on    on
4    WS-X6348-RJ-45      100.38  2.39   100.38  2.39  on    on
5    WS-SUP720-3BXL      328.44  7.82   328.44  7.82  on    on
6    WS-SUP720-3BXL      328.44  7.82   328.44  7.82  on    on
7    WS-X6348-RJ-45      100.38  2.39   100.38  2.39  on    on

Regards,
Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae -- COLT
Neil.McRae at COLT.NET


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
> Sent: 15 November 2006 21:55
> To: Simon Lockhart
> Cc: Church, Chuck; Gert Doering; Jay Ford; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:15:09PM +0000, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> > On the 6503, slot 2 reserves enough power for you to plug in a 2nd
> Supervisor,
> > which is why it looks like the 6516 in that slot is using more power
> than the
> > other...
> 
> Hmmm.  Good point.
> 
> (Anyone having -GBIC blades in *other* slots with differing power
> requirements?)
> 
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> 
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-
> muenchen.de
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list