[c-nsp] power requirement for sup720 migration

[Daniel Suchy]

On 11/16/2006 03:40 PM, nick.nauwelaerts at thomson.com wrote:
>> Isn't he affected with bug with incorrect EEPROM programing on some
>> 6748? See document at
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products
>> _field_notice09186a00802861e1.shtml
>>
>> BR
>> Dan
>>
>> On 11/16/2006 03:11 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:17:31AM +0100, 
>> nick.nauwelaerts at thomson.com wrote:
>>>> It doesn't even have to be a module based blade:
>>>> 10   WS-X6748-GE-TX      277.62  6.61   277.62  6.61  on    on
>>>> 11   WS-X6748-GE-TX      325.50  7.75   325.50  7.75  on    on
>>>>
>>>> 10 is a version 1.2 card, 11 is a version 2.2 card.
>>> Interesting to see the more recent card draw *more* power.
> 
> Nope,
> We're getting the correct -7A:
> 
>   (FRU is 'CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet')
>   OEM String = 'Cisco Systems'
>   Product Number = 'WS-X6748-GE-TX'
>   Serial Number = 'SAL********'
>   Manufacturing Assembly Number = '73-9399-03'
>   Manufacturing Assembly Revision = 'A0'
>   Hardware Revision = 2.2
>   Current supplied (+) or consumed (-) = -7.00A
> 

But this your "show" output is for module in slot 11 (revision you
reported match that slot), which reports correct value (and I have same
here). What says module in slot 10?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20061116/fa464649/attachment.bin