[c-nsp] Invalid MOI?

Jason Koh kohtohshyr at pacific.net.sg
Thu Oct 26 01:50:18 EDT 2006


Hi Bruce

192.168.38.4 is actually the loopback of the next router which I am peering 
with. The peer is between 192.168.38.4 and 192.168.38.35, both which are 
loopbacks.

#sh ip route 192.168.38.4
Routing entry for 192.168.38.4/32
  Known via "ospf 10", distance 110, metric 1, type intra area
  Last update from 172.16.91.4 on GigabitEthernet0/1.11, 20:29:18 ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 172.16.38.4, from 192.168.38.4, 20:29:18 ago, via GigabitEthernet0/1.11
      Route metric is 1, traffic share count is 1

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce Pinsky" <bep at whack.org>
To: "Jason Koh" <kohtohshyr at pacific.net.sg>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Invalid MOI?


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jason Koh wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Would like to know what causes Invalid MOI (MPLS output information). 
>> From what I know MOI is used when there is IP over MPLS, and it includes 
>> next hop, outgoing interface and outgoing labels.
>>
>> Well, I keep getting Invalid MOIs in my pseudowires. However all the 
>> necessary information for label switching is already there. Anybody knows 
>> of any other factors why there is an Invalid MOI here?
>>
>> Here are the outputs.
>>
>> #sh mpls l2transport vc 700 detail
>> Local interface: Se2/0 up, line protocol up, HDLC up
>>   Destination address: 20.20.20.1, VC ID: 700, VC status: down
>>     Output interface: if-?(0), imposed label stack {}
>>     Preferred path: not configured
>>     Default path: no route
>>     Next hop: Invalid MOI
>>   Create time: 00:03:10, last status change time: 00:03:06
>>   Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 20.20.20.1:0 up
>>     MPLS VC labels: local 1298, remote 16
>>     Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>     MTU: local 1500, remote 1500
>>     Remote interface description:
>>   Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>>   VC statistics:
>>     packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>>     byte totals:   receive 0, send 0
>>     packet drops:  receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> #sh ip cef 20.20.20.1/32
>> 20.20.20.1/32
>>   nexthop 192.168.38.4 GigabitEthernet0/1.11 label 734272
>>
>> sh mpls forwarding-table 20.20.20.1
>>
>> Local  Outgoing      Prefix              Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next 
>> Hop
>> Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
>> None   734272        20.20.20.1/32   0                   Gi0/1.11 
>> 192.168.38.4
>>
>>
>
> Well, the next hop for that label is 192.168.38.4.  What does the
> reachability for that prefix look like?
>
> - --
> =========
> bep
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFFQEb0E1XcgMgrtyYRAkh8AJ4rR0QiKNzc5cHqtUI7yu+7wIbJEACgleRd
> l5iAjn2aqO28jhb80NyP930=
> =A02T
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list