[c-nsp] Your opinions on router throughput
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Sat Oct 28 04:19:46 EDT 2006
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:17:22PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > Regarding the original question: a NPE-300 should handle 45 Mbit of load
> > just fine, *even* if it's all small packets - the "routerperformance.pdf"
> > file claims 180 Mbit throughput with 64 byte packets for the NPE-300,
> > and those numbers tend to be fairly realistic.
>
> 180Mbit/s of 64 byte packets through an NPE300? And that 7206 fits in 1U
> of rack space too, doesn't it?
>
> For the humor impaired, I'm calling BS on those numbers. I've watched
> NPE300's quit working at far lower traffic loads.
The original marketing numbers have been 300kpps (<-> NPE-300) - and
those certainly are not realistic.
>From what others have reported, the routerperformance.pdf numbers seem
to be a pretty good match on what the box really can do.
(Regarding "responsiveness under high packet load" - this might need to
depend somewhat on scheduler tuning, and having CEF turned on)
>From our own experience, the 7200s - with all sorts of NPEs - have done
a VERY good job, even under difficult circumstances - like "a hosted customer
server spewing out 100 Mbit of small UDP packets". SQL slammer *did* cause
quite some pain, but that was due to "ip accounting" being turned on,
and the box falling back to mostly process switching...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list