[c-nsp] ASA replying to ARP packets for other hosts...

[Shakeel Ahmad]

yes ... i can't think of a reason why static translations are related to
prox-arp. however it do relates to Global PAT if enabled on any interface...


shakeel



On 9/6/06, Laurent Geyer <lgeyer at 085zehn.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/6/06, Joseph Jackson <JJackson at aninetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > Its enabled by default because thats how static translations work.  When
> > you do a static the pix has to answer for the host since it isn't a
> > layer 3 hop.
>
>
> Static translations aren't necessarily reliant on proxy-arp, in fact I
> would
> argue they have nothing to do with each other. It's more like a crutch for
> those of us that like to live in the undeterministic world and don't care
> much for persistent static routes on hosts.
>
> - Laurent
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>