[c-nsp] Cisco 7206 Vs. 7301 --> PPPoE Application
dxz107 at gmail.com
Sun Sep 10 21:28:10 EDT 2006
Hmm - it's news to me that the 7301 was designed for Japanese markets.
The 7301's guts are comprised (basically) of a NPE-G1 engine. So very
similar performance can be expected from a 7301 when compared to a
7200VXR/NPE-G1.
Also the 7301, does in fact, come with a dual power option.
It's less flexible than a 7200 in that it can only accept one PA.
On 9/10/06, Cisco Boy <firstccie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone shed the light the comparasion between these 2 option?
> I have been told by Cisco Sales manager that there is technically no
> difference between these platfarm. And 7301 was specially built for
> Japanease market.
>
> 1) 7206 has Redundant PS while 7301 doesn't
> 2) Both supports 16K PPPOE users
> 3) 7206 has more flixibility then 7301.
>
> A few question which I can't find.
>
> 1) What is the backplane of both routers?
> 2) If both routers are loaded with the 16K users (which Cisco claims),
> what would be the average bandwidth per user? (@?)
>
> Thanks for your inputs.
>
> Cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list