[c-nsp] Router recommendation

Scott Granados sgranados at jeteye.com
Fri Sep 15 12:41:36 EDT 2006


This is frequently a good way to go and there are companies that can
help you smartnet the boxes.

You might also try a used reseller like networkhardware, recurrent or
dwc.  It just all depends on your needs and if you need brand new gear
or not.

G. Scott Granados
Sr. Network Operations Specialist
OFFICE: 415-946-2112 EXT. 222
CELL: 408-569-4017
URL: http://www.jeteye.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rick Kunkel
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:34 AM
To: Rodney Dunn
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router recommendation

Another possibility...  i've heard that 12000 series can be had 
relatively inexpensively on Ebay.  Any thoughts on these?

Thanks,

Rick

On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Rodney Dunn wrote:

> I don't think you should be looking at a 65xx for DSL aggregation.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:45:33AM -0400, jim bartus wrote:
> >
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/tools/quickreference/routerperforma
nce.pdf
> > 
> > by my reading you would be straddeling the line between an NPE-G2
and a
> > Sup32, but you gotta weigh the fact that those are 64byte packets
against
> > whatever affect your featureset is going to impose.
> > 
> > -jim
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/14/06, Rick Kunkel <kunkel at w-link.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had (on and off-list) recommendations for the NPE-G2.  I also
forgot
> > > to specify what NPE I have now.  I have the NPE-G1 now, and we had
> > > considered staying with it, but I thought I remember seeing
somewhere on
> > > this list (with a link to a site published by Cisco that listed
various
> > > routers and their theoretical packet or bit limits) something that
> > > indicated to me that the NPE-G1 wasn't gonna cut it.  It was a
while ago
> > > though, and I may have misread it.  Perhaps I mistook packets per
second
> > > for bits per second.
> > >
> > > Is the NPE-G1 possibly good enough for what I'll be throwing at
it?  If
> > > not, is the NPE-G2 a substantial step up?  Also, is it possible
for me to
> > > simply purchase a NPE-G2 and swap it with the NPE-G1 that I
already have
> > > in my 7206VXR chassis?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Rick
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rick,
> > > >
> > > > I don't work in the BB agg space a lot but it sounds to me
> > > > like your options would be:
> > > >
> > > > 72xx with the new NPE-G2
> > > >
> > > > or either a 10k box. I've worked on a 10k box handling over 25k
sessions
> > > > running well over a gig before.
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure others with them in deployment can give you some
references.
> > > >
> > > > Rodney
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:36:43PM -0700, Rick Kunkel wrote:
> > > > > Heya folks... I'm pretty dim on the upper lever Cisco gear,
and we're
> > > in
> > > > > the market for something burlier than the 7206 we've currently
got.  I
> > > > > need some suggestions for products...
> > > > >
> > > > > The requirements:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. We're terminating a DSL Aggregation DS-3, so there must be
an
> > > > > electrical and/or optical DS-3 module available for it.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2.  At least 3 GigEthernet ports, either somewhat built-in or
in
> > > modules.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3.  Capable of handling at least 3 full BGP routing tables.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4.  Must be able to do operating-system-wise everything that
our
> > > current
> > > > > 7206 does, like "atm route-bridged ip" stuff and 802.1Q.  (I
have a
> > > > > feeling this is kind of a "it goes without saying" type of
> > > requirement,
> > > > > but I wanted to be clear...)
> > > > >
> > > > > 5.  Able to route/switch about 1Gbps from the various internet
facing
> > > > > interfaces to the various internal facing interfaces.  (I'm
sure this
> > > is
> > > > > not a simple answer, but unfortunately, that's about all I've
got to
> > > go on
> > > > > right now.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Rick Kunkel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list