[c-nsp] HSRP Question
Richard Danielli
richard.danielli at esubnet.com
Mon Sep 25 11:26:46 EDT 2006
I think you will run into a problem, if both routers show the same priority.
If memory serves, leave one at priority 100 (default) and you should be good to go.
best of luck,
-rd-
Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi there...
>
> Just a question on HSRP to make sure I understand..:)
>
> Router A
> --------
>
> interface ethernet0
> no shutdown
> ip address 10.2.0.1 255.255.0.0
> standby 1 ip 10.2.0.20
> standby 1 priority 105
> standby 1 preempt delay minimum 10
> standby 1 timers 3 10
> standby 1 track ethernet1 10
> standby 1 track ethernet2 10
>
> Router B
> --------
>
> interface ethernet0
> no shutdown
> ip address 10.2.0.2 255.255.0.0
> standby 1 ip 10.2.0.20
> standby 1 priority 105
> standby 1 preempt delay minimum 10
> standby 1 timers 3 10
> standby 1 track ethernet1 10
> standby 1 track ethernet2 10
>
> Can the standby IP address be *outside* of the subnet on the interfaces?
> Sorry, fairly new to HSRP....
>
> We would like to move our BGP connections to HSRP basically and trying
> to find the best way. We have a pair of 6509's feeding the layer2
> connectivity to a GSR and I'd like to setup 2 ports physically for every
> BGP connection. The slight complication comes in the fact that most of
> these /30 connections for BGP are the upstream's IP space. I don't want
> to redo all the connections, would rather use what we have now...
>
> Thoughts? ;)
>
> Paul Stewart
> Network Administrator
> Nexicom Inc.
> http://www.nexicom.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Richard Danielli
President - eSubnet
416.203.5253
http://www.eSubnet.com
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list