[c-nsp] HSRP Question

Richard Danielli richard.danielli at esubnet.com
Mon Sep 25 11:26:46 EDT 2006


I think you will run into a problem, if both routers show the same priority.

If memory serves, leave one at priority 100 (default) and you should be good to go.

best of luck,
-rd-

Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi there...
> 
> Just a question on HSRP to make sure I understand..:)
> 
> Router A
> --------
> 
> interface ethernet0
>  no shutdown
>  ip address 10.2.0.1 255.255.0.0
>  standby 1 ip 10.2.0.20
>  standby 1 priority 105
>  standby 1 preempt delay minimum 10
>  standby 1 timers 3 10
>  standby 1 track ethernet1 10
>  standby 1 track ethernet2 10
> 
> Router B
> --------
> 
> interface ethernet0
>  no shutdown
>  ip address 10.2.0.2 255.255.0.0
>  standby 1 ip 10.2.0.20
>  standby 1 priority 105
>  standby 1 preempt delay minimum 10
>  standby 1 timers 3 10
>  standby 1 track ethernet1 10
>  standby 1 track ethernet2 10
> 
> Can the standby IP address be *outside* of the subnet on the interfaces?
> Sorry, fairly new to HSRP....
> 
> We would like to move our BGP connections to HSRP basically and trying
> to find the best way.  We have a pair of 6509's feeding the layer2
> connectivity to a GSR and I'd like to setup 2 ports physically for every
> BGP connection.  The slight complication comes in the fact that most of
> these /30 connections for BGP are the upstream's IP space.  I don't want
> to redo all the connections, would rather use what we have now...
> 
> Thoughts? ;)
> 
> Paul Stewart
> Network Administrator
> Nexicom Inc.
> http://www.nexicom.net/ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
Richard Danielli
President - eSubnet

416.203.5253
http://www.eSubnet.com


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list