[c-nsp] 2960 for video & qos

[Dan]

So matching and IP and setting the DSCP = AF41, then these switches 
should work just fine for Video QOS?  I don't need any layer 3 
capabilities because these switches will be within a subnet.

Dan.

liviu.pislaru at gmail.com wrote:
> hello,
>
> yes, you can use ip access list on 2960 even if it's only a L2 device:
>
> Example: (mark <IP> with DSCP = EF)
>
> ip access-list standard acl-test
> 	permit <IP>
>
> class-map cm-test
> 	match access-group name acl-test
>
> policy-map pm-test
> 	class cm-test
> 		set dscp EF
>
> (service-policy input pm-test on interface)
>
> --
> liviu.
> On Tuesday 03 April 2007 15:04, Sean Watkins wrote:
>   
>> In the 2960 configuration library; it says you can use IP access lists
>> in class-map commands for police/qos etc. Do you know if this is true?
>>
>> Search for "Classifying Traffic by Using ACLs "
>>
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6406/products_configuration_guide_
>> chapter09186a00805a7699.html
>>
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sean Watkins
>> North Rock Communications
>> Phone: 441-540-4102
>>
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Liviu Pislaru
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 12:23 AM
>>> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960 for video & qos
>>>
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> 2960 works just fine for LAN QoS. you can mark, classifiy and
>>> police, you can adjust maping, buffers and output queues
>>> (1p3q3t). if you have voip on your network you can also use
>>> "auto-qos"; use 3560 only if you need la L3 device.
>>>
>>> --
>>> liviu.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dan" <dan at technc.com>
>>> Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:06 AM
>>> Subject: [c-nsp] 2960 for video & qos
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> We are setting up a 6 site video conferencing system and we need to
>>>> replace some of our switches and I was wondering if a 2960
>>>>         
>>> would do the
>>>
>>>       
>>>> job as far as QOS goes?  Or should I go with a 3560?
>>>>
>>>> Dan.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>       
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>