[c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2

[Brian Turnbow]

Hi 
We are activating alot of new customers with VoIP services and the trend on the router cpu was growing fairly steadily.
We did not have any issues but I now sleep much better with 35% cpu as opposed to 75%, 
it gives more room for those unexpected pleasures that mr Murphy always has in store for us.

Brian






-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: mercoledì 18 aprile 2007 17.49
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2

Thanks for sharing your experience. 

Did your users experience performance degradation with the NPE-400 when your
CPU was working that hard?  More precisely, what was the reason you upgraded
to the G1 if you had 25% of the CPU left. =)

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Turnbow [mailto:b.turnbow at twt.it] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:40 AM
To: frnkblk at iname.com; clayton at mnsi.net; dxz107 at gmail.com;
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2

I recently did an upgrade from npe-400 to G1 on a router with 1600pppoa
users that pumps 50Mbs(about 40% of that Voip traffic)
The 400 was running at 75% the G1 dropped it to 35% 
I would expect the G2 to do even better. 

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: mercoledì 18 aprile 2007 3.39
To: clayton at mnsi.net; dxz107 at gmail.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2

That raises a good question...if an NPE-400 with 2000 PPPoA and 35 PPPoE
operates at 44% today, what would a G2 bring that down to?

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Clayton Zekelman
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 7:08 PM
To: ; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2



I'm running one with Version 12.4(4)XD4.  So far 15 weeks of uptime, no
issues with 924 L2TP, and 762 PPPoE sessions - 24% CPU Utilization.

Come to think of it, I would have thought I'd be seeing a bit better
performance.


----- Original Message ---------------

Subject: [c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2
   From: " " <dxz107 at gmail.com>
   Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:27:02 -0400
     To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net

>Does anyone have experience/feedback that they're willing to share on
>the moderately new G2 engine ?  I suspect that software is more of a
>wild card than the hardware itself.  Does anyone have an opinion on
>whether one is better off with 12.4.11T or 12.2SB ?
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/