[c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

[Joe Shen]

And, to my knowledge, technical research on OSPF is
more fertile than IS-IS, and new feature is introduced
to OSPF eariler than IS-IS. 




--- "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)"
<oboehmer at cisco.com>写道:

> omar parihuana <> wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007
> 7:32 PM:
> 
> > Hi list,
> > 
> > We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30
> PE Routers and 2 P
> > Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the
> IGP is OSPF,
> > however  ISIS was proposed too.  What is the best?
> IS-IS or OSPF? and
> > Why? regarding the small network.
> 
> check the archives, this has been discussed before..
> it boils down to
> "use what you're most comfortable and familiar
> with", and as you're
> using OSPF already, the choice should be clear.
> 
> 	oli
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 



      ___________________________________________________________ 
抢注雅虎免费邮箱3.5G容量，20M附件！ 
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com