[c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2
Justin M. Streiner
streiner at cluebyfour.org
Wed Apr 25 09:43:25 EDT 2007
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Euan Galloway wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:49:53AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>> Here is a rough spreadsheet with the numbers we had done.
>
> For the attachment challenged amoungst us...
How were these tests performed? Was this done with different packet
sizes, or the worst-case scanerio - lots of tiny packets?
jms
> (excuse the bad reformatting).
> (CPU) (CPU)
> Pps NPE-G1 NPE-G2
> each direction
>
> 100,000 31% 49%
> 125,000 37% 51%
> 150,000 44% 55%
> 175,000 53% 58%
> 200,000 61% 60%
> 225,000 67% 61%
> 250,000 75% 63%
> 275,000 84% 65%
> 300,000 90% 68%
> 325,000 98% 70%
> 350,000 100% 73%
> 375,000 100% 75%
> 400,000 dropped packets 400,000 pps 78%
> 425,000 81%
> 450,000 83%
> 475,000 86%
> 500,000 88%
> 525,000 91%
> 550,000 94%
> 575,000 95%
> 600,000 97%
> 625,000 98%
> 650,000 99%
> 675,000 99%
> 700,000 99%
> 725,000 99%
> 750,000 dropped packets at 750,000 pps
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list