[c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2

Justin M. Streiner streiner at cluebyfour.org
Wed Apr 25 09:43:25 EDT 2007


On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Euan Galloway wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:49:53AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>> Here is a rough spreadsheet with the numbers we had done.
>
> For the attachment challenged amoungst us...

How were these tests performed?  Was this done with different packet 
sizes, or the worst-case scanerio - lots of tiny packets?

jms

> (excuse the bad reformatting).
> 	(CPU)	(CPU)
> Pps 	NPE-G1	NPE-G2
> each direction
>
> 100,000	31%	49%
> 125,000	37%	51%
> 150,000	44%	55%
> 175,000	53%	58%
> 200,000	61%	60%
> 225,000	67%	61%
> 250,000	75%	63%
> 275,000	84%	65%
> 300,000	90%	68%
> 325,000	98%	70%
> 350,000	100%	73%
> 375,000	100%	75%
> 400,000	dropped packets 400,000 pps	78%
> 425,000		81%
> 450,000		83%
> 475,000		86%
> 500,000		88%
> 525,000		91%
> 550,000		94%
> 575,000		95%
> 600,000		97%
> 625,000		98%
> 650,000		99%
> 675,000		99%
> 700,000		99%
> 725,000		99%
> 750,000		dropped packets at 750,000 pps
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list