[c-nsp] 7200 / NPE-G2

[Rodney Dunn]

Thanks Euan.

Note that the pps number really should be doubles because it
was bidirectional traffic. IIRC it was 64 byte packets.

So the G1 showed some dropped frames at 800kpps and the
G2 showed some drops at 1.5Mpps. This was a quick test we
did to simply compare the CPU numbers with the load increase.

Rodney

On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:26:03PM +0100, Euan Galloway wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:49:53AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> > Here is a rough spreadsheet with the numbers we had done.
> 
> For the attachment challenged amoungst us...
> 
> (excuse the bad reformatting).
> 	(CPU)	(CPU)
> Pps 	NPE-G1	NPE-G2
> each direction	
> 		
> 100,000	31%	49%
> 125,000	37%	51%
> 150,000	44%	55%
> 175,000	53%	58%
> 200,000	61%	60%
> 225,000	67%	61%
> 250,000	75%	63%
> 275,000	84%	65%
> 300,000	90%	68%
> 325,000	98%	70%
> 350,000	100%	73%
> 375,000	100%	75%
> 400,000	dropped packets 400,000 pps	78%
> 425,000		81%
> 450,000		83%
> 475,000		86%
> 500,000		88%
> 525,000		91%
> 550,000		94%
> 575,000		95%
> 600,000		97%
> 625,000		98%
> 650,000		99%
> 675,000		99%
> 700,000		99%
> 725,000		99%
> 750,000		dropped packets at 750,000 pps
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/