[c-nsp] MLPPP maximum load

[a. rahman isnaini r. sutan]

Yep, all E1s going to/from same equipment (both 7200).
I did, but it seems didn't make any better :(


:: a. rahman isnaini r. sutan



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lincoln Dale (ltd)" <ltd at cisco.com>
To: "a. rahman isnaini r. sutan" <risnaini at speed.net.id>; 
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] MLPPP maximum load


> I'm running this MLPPP on 7200 NPE 400.
> Much better bundling up to 8 T1s/E1s as the overhead not significantly
> different againts le say bundling 2-3 E1s ?
> Thanks this is fresh to me.
>
> Sometimes weird thing like packet loss happening.
> Clearing ARP entries, shutting down the interface MLPPP or even serial
> ports, and bring them back to up no more loss, even the traffic
eventually
> raises up and higher.

are all the T1s/E1s going to/from the same place?

do they all have similar link distance/latency characteristics?
you may need to tune the mlppp fragment-delay...


cheers,

lincoln.


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.17/951 - Release Date: 8/13/2007 
10:15 AM