[c-nsp] TE over Etherchannel

[Phil Bedard]

All of the above.  :)   It would be a situation where a location has  
two routers with each one having long-haul POS going east/west and
they are tied together using Etherchannels.

Phil


On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:51 AM, <alaerte.vidali at nsn.com>  
<alaerte.vidali at nsn.com> wrote:
.
> Phil,
>
> Considering these 2 statements
>
> - Use layer 3 etherchannel as path for a backup tunnel (where the  
> backup
> tunnel is protecting a POS or Giga interface)
>
> - Use FRR feature to protect the etherchannel
>
> What is your test related to?
>
> Best Regards.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Phil Bedard [mailto:philxor at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:49 AM
> To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro)
> Cc: rodunn at cisco.com; Cisco-nsp Net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] TE over Etherchannel
>
> I'd also like to see any restrictions that are placed on doing FRR on
> Etherchannels, since I was going to be testing this functionality  
> in the
> near future...Is there any roadmap for this feature for SRB?
>
> Phil
>
>
> On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:58 AM, <alaerte.vidali at nsn.com>
> <alaerte.vidali at nsn.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Do you know if the restriction is only for dynamic path?
>>
>> I have seem and tested implementations using static path where the
>> backup tunnel (used by FRR) takes layer 3 etherchannel, and it worked
>> fine during the failure simulation.
>>
>> Br,
>> Alaerte
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Rodney Dunn [mailto:rodunn at cisco.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 8:07 PM
>> To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro)
>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] TE over Etherchannel
>>
>> That's right. I've seen that from the BU's that it's not currently
>> supported. I hear it's on the roadmap to be "officially" supported.
>>
>> Rodney
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 07:04:09AM -0500, alaerte.vidali at nsn.com
>> wrote:
>>>  Have you heard such affirmation before?
>>>
>>> "TE FRR is not supported over Etherchannel"
>>>
>>> Under SX releases, the only feature that it says it is not supported
>>> under etherchannel is DS-TE.
>>> I have used backup tunnel taking etherchannel and it worked for
>>> years.
>>
>>>
>>> Now this statement means that between two P routers layer 3
>>> etherchannel cannot be used.
>>>
>>> Tks,
>>> Alaerte
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> Phil Bedard
> philxor at gmail.com
>
>
>

Phil Bedard
philxor at gmail.com