[c-nsp] bgp slow prefix learning
Jason LeBlanc
jml at packetpimp.org
Tue Aug 21 13:37:18 EDT 2007
Maybe I was wrong, I changed my prefix lists to /24 and cleared the
upstreams, one got to 230k routes in a couple of minutes, the other is
still taking awhile, its at 15k in about the same time period.
Jason LeBlanc wrote:
> I know one end is Cisco, a 7600/Sup720, no idea what code. The other
> end I have no clue. I added the mtu, no change as of yet. In 2.5 hrs
> I've gotten 1087 prefixes on one, in 1 hr I've gotten 631 on the other.
> I've never seen this move so slowly.
>
> Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:42:14PM -0400, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm wondering if I have something that is by design or if something else
>>> is slowing my routers down. I have two 2811s with 768 megs running
>>> 12.4(4)T3, each connected to different upstreams via fast ethernet. I'm
>>> using prefix lists to limit them to /22, but I should have enough ram
>>> for a full /24 view. My problem is that anytime I clear a neighbor it
>>> takes them hours to learn all the prefixes again, which has forced me to
>>> add static defaults to compensate. My cpu is 2-4% during this, so I
>>> can't see how its cpu bound. Anyone have any ideas?
>>>
>>>
>> Enable "ip tcp path-mtu-discovery" globally.
>>
>> that should help. If they're also using a Juniper,
>> some much older code had some odd propogation properties. They
>> may need to upgrade code. I think this was back in 4.x or 5.x.
>>
>> - Jared
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list