[c-nsp] 7600 SRA vs. SRB

[Rubens Kuhl Jr.]

Upgrading from SRB to SRB2 made two 7600/Sup720s that were showing
constant high CPU usage and routing protocol flapping to drop CPU
usage to a few percent and become much more stable. No experience with
SRB1, though.


Rubens


On Dec 26, 2007 12:45 PM, Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We're running 12.2(33)SRB1 on a couple of 7600/Sup720's acting as core
> switches in an MPLS network. We've recently seen strange symptoms where
> traffic apparantly crosses VRFs unexpectedly, although we don't have
> enough data to say for sure. Reload solved the problem both times it
> occurred.
>
> We're about to upgrade to SRB2 and see if the problem continues, but are
> thinking about using SRA instead. I can see the SRA6 earned the "Limited
> Deployment" tag, but I'm unsure if this is better or worse or neither
> compared to "Early Deployment". Can anyone shed some light on that?
>
> We can live without the SRB features (according to Feature Navigator).
>
> Regards,
> Peter Rathlev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>