[c-nsp] Cosmetic bug or unsupported NPE?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:35:54AM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> I'm also curious if anyone's already upgraded an NPE300 carrying full 
> routes from 12.2(18)S to 12.2.25(S).  How much less memory is available? 
> I'm just wondering how much longer these NPE300s can be nursed along 
> before we have to replace them with at least NPE400s with 512MB RAM in 
> order to hold full routes.

I have been told by TAC that the IPv4 security problems have been fixed
in 12.2(18)S12 (because we asked about a rebuild for our NPE-225s).  So 
this might be a viable mitigation path for you.

The IPv6 problem is still present in (18)S12, but that might not worry
everbody else... - it *does* worry us, so we're still working with TAC
to get an (18)S rebuild that fixes *all* issues.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de