[c-nsp] Cosmetic bug or unsupported NPE?

Jon Lewis jlewis at lewis.org
Wed Feb 7 21:34:14 EST 2007


On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Saku Ytti wrote:

>> I'm also curious if anyone's already upgraded an NPE300 carrying full
>> routes from 12.2(18)S to 12.2.25(S).  How much less memory is available?
>> I'm just wondering how much longer these NPE300s can be nursed along
>> before we have to replace them with at least NPE400s with 512MB RAM in
>> order to hold full routes.
>
> I run NPE300 with 12.2(25)S extensively. With 256MB + two full views I'd
> recommend not to do, unless you have extremely small iBGP and no VRF.
> But even with tiny iBGP and no VRF it's race against time you'll soon
> loose, so start planning a design which does not require full table
> in NPE300's.

Are you using the memory-size iomem trick to free up another 32MB of RAM 
(that would have been i/o buffers)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis                   |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list