[c-nsp] VRF-Lite Question

[Shakeel Ahmad]

Thankyou all for feedback -

Only reason we dropped GRE was involvement of PIX - and a want for a routing
till PIX interface.

As far as the config management overhead is concerned, i believe there's
very lil chance when you modify route table for Wireless users. Besides on a
discussion with a network design engineer for an enterprise, he shared that
we ran Data & Voice in seperate VRF's and only Device Management is done via
"Global" VRF or global route-table.

About Cisco WC, its costly specially when an organization is from South Asia
and have to keep their current infrastructure :)

thanks again.

SA


On 2/13/07, Ray Burkholder <ray at oneunified.net> wrote:
>
> The 3550 and 3560 do support gre.  Just not fully implemented in hardware.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists [mailto:lists at hojmark.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:24
> > To: 'Jeff Kell'; 'Ray Burkholder'
> > Cc: '[c-nsp]'
> > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite Question
> >
> > > That's the ticket -- GRE tunnel over the global routing table.
> >
> > I believe the OP mentioned small Catalysts (3550/3560/4500)
> > in his post. None of them support GRE... Neither does the
> > PIX, as he mentioned.
> >
> > -A
> >
> >
> > --
> > Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at
> > http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at
> http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>