[c-nsp] 12.2SR PB on CCO for 65xx and 76xx split
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Wed Feb 21 15:34:58 EST 2007
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:52:45PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> But why spending time on a rant, better spend the time looking for
> alternatives. If I have to buy a new chassis anyway, I might buy a
> Force10 or Juniper one...
Having been running SRA/SRA1/SRA2 on several chassis since it came out, at
this point I'm ready to go back to SX anyways. The SR branch has so far
proven to be HORRIBLY unstable in production, even for Cisco, and all the
features in the world aren't worth anything if you can't keep the box
running. I can't imagine why Cisco wants to shoot themselves in the foot
like this, but at least they picked a good time to do it.
I don't have much positive to say about Force10 for NSP use really, but
having spent some time playing with the new Juniper MX960 platform I think
that Cisco's 6500/7600 NSP sales are about to get murdered. It's certainly
not cheap, but IMHO Juniper did a good job of pricing it based on exactly
how much more it is worth than an equivalent 6500.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list