[c-nsp] 12.2SR PB on CCO for 65xx and 76xx split
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Wed Feb 21 16:06:04 EST 2007
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > the SX* software has no current plans to implement any of these
> >silly checks. If you're happy with SX*, stick with it. I'd avoid
> >buying a 7600 unless there's a compelling technical reason. it's surely
> >not a service provider platform as it has no software modularity.
>
> To punnish the 7600 group? The 7600 seems like the more versatile
> product now, having the ability to run either SX or SR code.
My mentality is to not reward bad behaviour. Buying a 7600
is "rewarding" the business unit that brought you this mess. The
internal politics involved in this are quite interesting and amusing.
Personally, I would insure that you do your own due-dilligence on
this. It's gotten very messy and I wouldn't be shocked if people don't
start to treat these two groups that have so much shared as radioactive
as a result. The timing of the Mx-960 makes this an interesting time to
work on buying an 'ethernet' device if you're getting something new.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list