[c-nsp] 12.2SR PB on CCO for 65xx and 76xx split

Jared Mauch jared at puck.nether.net
Wed Feb 21 16:06:04 EST 2007


On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Jared Mauch wrote:
> 
> >	the SX* software has no current plans to implement any of these
> >silly checks.  If you're happy with SX*, stick with it.  I'd avoid
> >buying a 7600 unless there's a compelling technical reason.  it's surely
> >not a service provider platform as it has no software modularity.
> 
> To punnish the 7600 group?  The 7600 seems like the more versatile 
> product now, having the ability to run either SX or SR code.

	My mentality is to not reward bad behaviour.  Buying a 7600
is "rewarding" the business unit that brought you this mess.  The
internal politics involved in this are quite interesting and amusing.

	Personally, I would insure that you do your own due-dilligence on
this.  It's gotten very messy and I wouldn't be shocked if people don't
start to treat these two groups that have so much shared as radioactive
as a result.  The timing of the Mx-960 makes this an interesting time to
work on buying an 'ethernet' device if you're getting something new.

	- Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list