[c-nsp] Cisco ACE?

[Tom Sands]

He also have several deployed in production with a few bugs so far.  We 
have them deployed in both HA and non setups.  The major issues so far 
is random failover, and the truncating of configs when upgrading code.

By in large it is (or will be) superior to the CSS and CSM, but there 
are some kinks being worked out right now.


------------------------------------------------------
Tom Sands			  				
Chief Network Engineer				
Rackspace Managed Hosting	    	
(210)447-4391		   	
------------------------------------------------------


Dean Smith wrote:
> I have it in production....and am currently suffering quite a few bugs.
> 
> We did our testing in Oct/November and went live in December. 1st issue we
> got - we got the "upgrade code" response (A1_4 released late Dec). So bang
> went 2 months of lab testing. Now we're debugging the code in Live.
> 
> Dean
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Olav Langeland
> Sent: 20 February 2007 18:41
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco ACE?
> 
> Hi,
>  
> i searched the archive and found some older posts about ACE, but only
> questions. Here goes again: anyone using Cisco ACE in a production
> environment? Buggy? Stable? 
> We are looking into replacing some old LB equipment doing http/https/email
> with ACE or CSM, our sales tech only talks ACE.. 
>  
> regards
> Olav Langeland
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>