[c-nsp] FWSM - status unknown

[szilard csordas]

No, it is 6509.

rgs,
Szilard

"Todd, Douglas M." <DTODD at PARTNERS.ORG> írta:

> Is this being slotted in a 6513? 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> > szilard csordas
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 1:01 PM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM - status unknown
> > 
> > I already tried the power enable command, this was the output:
> > 
> > %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 1, 
power not
> > allowed: Unknown Card Type.
> > 
> > According the "show power" output the box has sufficient 
> > power to supply a new module, and the same module was working 
> > in this chassis for 6-7mounts.
> > 
> > Router#sh power
> > system power total =     3795.12 Watts (90.36 Amps @ 42V)
> > system power used =      1341.06 Watts (31.93 Amps @ 42V)
> > system power available = 2454.06 Watts (58.43 Amps @ 42V)
> > 
> > 
> > Of course, I tested the module in the other slot and in the 
> > other chassis as well. I got the same result. There is one 
> > more thing I could check...I could insert a different good 
> > module (e.g ethernet) into the particular slot.
> > Is it possible that the switch fabric is damaged just on those slots?
> > Also in the other box? It would be extremly extraordinary! :) 
> > Even then shouldn't it fall back to the shared 32G bus?
> > 
> > Thanks for the comments.
> > 
> > rgs,
> > Szilard
> > 
> > 
> > >Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch at cisco.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >I would suggest to open up a case with the TAC - something fishy 
is 
> > >going
> > on there.
> > 
> > >before that, you might try with "power enable module X" on the 
CLI
> > and see if you get any messages in the c6k's syslog at all - 
> > I *think* I might
> > >have seen something similar once in the lab when i was 
exceeding the
> > power budget for the existing power supply - but it is not sure.
> > 
> > >Another thing would be to try reseating into another slot, and if 
you
> > have the possibility - check the module in some other chassis.
> > 
> > > This version should be OK with sup720 and FWSM.
> > 
> > >cheers,
> > >andrew
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, szilard csordas wrote:
> > 
> > > As far as I know even with the unsupported chassis, at 
> > least the type 
> > > of the module has to be recognized,but it won't work.
> > > I dont't know either the hardware nor the software version 
> > of the FWSM 
> > > because it's status is  unknown.
> > >
> > > We also tried to connect a console cable to the internal 
> > RJ45 port, to 
> > > see what happens during the boot. It was totally blank. We 
> > tried speed 
> > > 19200 as well on the console.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Szilard
> > >
> > >
> > > Router#sh mod
> > > Mod Ports Card Type                              Model      
> >         Serial No.
> > > --- ----- -------------------------------------- 
> > ------------------ -----------
> > >  1    0  Unknown                                Unknown     
> >        Unknown
> > > ....
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The information transmitted in this electronic communication is 
intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may 
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, 
please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly 
dispose of this information.
> 
> 

_________________________________________
Válogasson friss álláshirdetéseink közül!
http://allas.origo.hu/