[c-nsp] EoMPLS - redunancy?

[Jens Brey]

Hi,

i would use hsrp between the 2 3750 devices ;) 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008047646d.html


Hf, Jens

Am Donnerstag, den 18.01.2007, 12:43 -0400 schrieb Sean Watkins:
> Hi,
> 
> If I build a EoMLPLS tunnel from say a 3750-M to 3750-3750, I basically
> build commands like this:
> 
> 3750-M A
> 
> !
> Int loopback0
> Ip address 1.2.1.3 255.255.255.255
> 
> interface FastEthernet1/0/1
>  no switchport
>  no ip address
>  no cdp enable
>  xconnect 1.2.1.4 1000 encapsulation mpls
>  no clns route-cache
> 
> 
> 3750-M B
> !
> Int loopback0
> Ip address 1.2.1.4 255.255.255.255
> 
> interface FastEthernet1/0/1
>  no switchport
>  no ip address
>  no cdp enable
>  xconnect 1.2.1.3 1000 encapsulation mpls
>  no clns route-cache
> 
> 
> Which works great.
> 
> 
> If I wanted to replace the 3750-B, with a 2 3750s for redundancy, how
> would that work? Is there anything in EoMPLS to specify say a second
> peer?
> 
> Ie
> 
> Xconnect 1.2.1.3 1000 encapsulation mpls backup 1.2.1.5?
> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sean Watkins
> North Rock Communications
> Phone: 441-540-4102
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/