[c-nsp] 3560 vs 4948 for Datacenter / iSCSI

[matthew zeier]

I ran a production ISP network where I used 3560s for iscsi.  Never had 
any problems - in reality, most end hosts never pushed/pulled anything 
more than 100Mbps (in my environment anyways).

Raj Patel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just seeking feedback on using a pair of 3560's vs a single 4948 at our
> datacenter for our server / san backbone.
> 
>>From what I can tell the 4948 is superior (fully non-blocking) but the
> for the same cost I can get a pair of 3560's which would provide better
> resiliancy / multi-pathing.
> 
> We'd probably hang about 10 systems off the device - if we used a
> dedicated storage network + redundant connections back to the LAN we
> start to use up a lot of ports really quickly.
> 
> Any opinions or feedback on which would be preferential would be
> appreciated. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Raj.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/