[c-nsp] PBR Strange behavior

[omar parihuana]

Hi,

I'm interesing in packets from 172.20.0.50, unfortunately I cannot test with
that IP, so I used 172.20.0.49. Now if the ip policy route-map has no effect
on 172.20.0.49, I'm wrong!!

Thanks a lot!


On 7/6/07, wayne.xiao at bt.com <wayne.xiao at bt.com> wrote:
>
> Bear in mind 'ip policy route-map BLAH' has no effect on self generated
> packets.
>
> In your test, are the packets matching the ACL sourced from 172.20.0.49
> (router itself) or 172.20.0.50?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of omar parihuana
> Sent: 03 July 2007 00:17
> To: nsp
> Subject: [c-nsp] PBR Strange behavior
>
> Hi List,
>
> I've configured an policy routing, however the packets don't match the
> policy. I re-checked the configuration and all seems fine, I don't know
> why
> that configuration don't work!!! (the packets traverse by default route
> and
> not by Next-hop configured into route-map.
>
> I've paste my configuration:
>
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0.73
> encapsulation dot1Q 73
> ip address 172.20.0.49 255.255.255.252
> no ip redirects
> no ip proxy-arp
> ip policy route-map NEXT-HOP
> no cdp enable
> arp timeout 300
> end
> !
>
> !
> route-map NEXT-HOP permit 10
> match ip address 160
> set interface Serial1/0:0
> set ip next-hop 172.16.1.134
> !
>
> !
> access-list 160 permit ip 172.20.0.48 0.0.0.3 any
> !
>
> Thanks
>
> *The router is a Cisco 3640 with CEF Enabled that works like MPLS-PE
> router.
>
> --
> Omar E.P.T
> -----------------
> Certified Networking Professionals make better Connections!
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
Omar E.P.T
-----------------