[c-nsp] Dual-Homed VPLS

[alaerte.vidali at nsn.com]

Hi Eric,

Exactly.

As PE would forward Spanning tree BPDUs transparently, I am considering
STP is also an option to block a link.
For example:


CE1-A_(fa-1/1)---------------  PE1=======PE2---------CE2-A (STP ROOT)   
    |                           \         /
    (fa-1/2)                     \       / 
    |_________________________    \     /
                                   PE3


Considering CE2-A is STP root, CE1-A would receive BPDU from both
interfaces, would choose fa1/1 as RP and would block fa1/2.
What do you think?


I hope we receive more feedback.


Best Regards,
Alaerte

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Eric Helm [mailto:helmwork at ruraltel.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:15 PM
To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro)
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Dual-Homed VPLS

Alaerte...
Are you talking about dual-homed VPLS endpoints? If so, I'd be curious
to hear what suggestions you receive for this topic. When I looked into
doing this, it seemed that using Flex-Links was the only viable
solution.

Regards,

/Eric

alaerte.vidali at nsn.com wrote:
>  Hi,
> 
> Do you indicate any reference for this topic?
> 
> I tried some books like "MPLS Configuration on Cisco IOS Software"
> (pretty good book) by Lancy and Umesh, but it only touch the subject.
> 
> Tks,
> Alaerte
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>