[c-nsp] 4503 switches design issue
gokhan senol
gokhanciscottl at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 6 08:02:39 EDT 2007
hi
i have two 4503 switches which are connected eachother as trunk via wireless.
switch A (user As) Layer 2 vlans vlan 1, vlan 10, vlan 20, vlan 100, vlan 200
layer3 vlan interfaces vlan 10: 192.168.10.0 (default gateway for PCs in network A )
vlan 100: 192.168.100.1
****other vlan ips omitted
switch B (User Bs) Layer 2 vlans vlan 1, vlan 10, vlan 20, vlan 100, vlan 200
layer3 vlan interfaces vlan 20: 192.168.20.0 (default gateway for PCs in network B )
vlan 100: 192.168.100.101
users stay mixed based on vlan design. I route networks over vlan 100
for example in switch B ip route 192.168.10.0/24 192.168.100.1
in switch A ip route 192.168.20.0/24 192.168.100.101
Do you think instead of the routing via vlan100, should i redesign like below?
in switch A int vlan20: 192.168.20.250/24 (an empty ip from vlan 20)
in switch B int vlan10: 192.168.10.250/24(an empty ip from vlan 10)
and removing ip route over vlan100 , can i have more accurate desing?
any idea ?
Thanks
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list