[c-nsp] 4503 switches design issue

gokhan senol gokhanciscottl at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 6 08:02:39 EDT 2007


hi

i have two 4503 switches which are connected eachother as trunk via wireless.

switch A (user As)   Layer 2 vlans  vlan 1, vlan 10, vlan 20, vlan 100, vlan 200
                layer3 vlan interfaces    vlan 10: 192.168.10.0 (default gateway for PCs in network A )
                                                    vlan 100:  192.168.100.1
****other vlan ips omitted
                                                    

switch B (User Bs)    Layer 2 vlans  vlan 1, vlan 10, vlan 20, vlan 100, vlan 200
                layer3 vlan interfaces    vlan 20: 192.168.20.0  (default gateway for PCs in network B  )
                                                    vlan 100:  192.168.100.101

users stay mixed based on vlan design. I  route  networks over vlan 100

for example in switch B   ip route 192.168.10.0/24   192.168.100.1  
                   in switch A   ip route 192.168.20.0/24  192.168.100.101

Do you think instead of the routing via vlan100, should i redesign like below?

in switch A    int vlan20: 192.168.20.250/24 (an empty ip from vlan 20)
in switch  B    int vlan10: 192.168.10.250/24(an empty ip from vlan 10)

and removing ip route over vlan100  ,  can i have more accurate desing?

any idea ?
Thanks


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list