[c-nsp] WAN optimization in IP carrier

[Brzoska, Dan]

Keep in mind that using optimization solutions might break things such
as ACLs, your sFlow/NetFlow/jFlow reporting tools.

You don't want to be in a situation where you have to turn off the
optimization tool to trouble shoot a problem (as is the case with some,
but not all, vendor's solutions).

-Dan
 (disclamer: I work for a tools vendor)

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wycliffe Bahati
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:17 AM
To: 'Wycliffe Bahati'; 'Pak Tong Poy'; 'Indra Simalango'
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WAN optimization in IP carrier



Packeteer is your best solution. Given the kind of bandwidth and
optimization you want.



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pak Tong Poy
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:59 AM
To: Indra Simalango
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WAN optimization in IP carrier

Hi my network topo is something like this
 ----GE------ [Router]----------2 X
STM1----------[Router]----GE------Upstream transit

I wish to reduce the Upstream transit traffic, so I can only put the
Optimization box in between the link like this:

 ----GE------[WAN Optimization box] ----- GE ------- [Router]----------2
X
STM1----------[Router]----GE------[WAN Optimization
box]-----GE-------Upstream transit

My target applications to be optimized are Static applications such as
file
transfer, pdf, static video...etc.

Any suggestion?
best regards

On 6/7/07, Indra Simalango <indra.simalango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm quite newbie in this field. So far, in my current company, I've
done
> some PoC using Cisco WAAS and Packeteer PacketShaperXpress (the one
with
> Acceleration & Compression module).
>
> For your requirements, how much WAN bandwidth do you have? What is
each
> connection type? Is it a fiberoptic, gigabit ethernet, or fair
ethernet?
> If
> may, please describe your network profile, what's main application
> traverse
> your WAN? Also, is there any requirement for Server consolidation?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Indra A. Simalango
> Associate Consultant, BSS/OSS
> PT. Packet Systems Indonesia
> www.dmxtechnologies.com
>
> On 5/25/07, Pak Tong Poy <paktongpoy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi group,
> > Anyone knows if there is any WAN optimization product for IP carrier
> > environment? I know there are product for entreprise environment. If
so
> > there are, anyone knows any IP carrier use them?
> > Many thanks,
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/843 - Release Date:
6/10/2007
1:39 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/843 - Release Date:
6/10/2007
1:39 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/843 - Release Date:
6/10/2007
1:39 PM
 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/