[c-nsp] Reasons *not* terminate PPPoE on 7500

Jim McBurnett jim at tgasolutions.com
Fri Jun 22 19:29:11 EDT 2007


Rodney,
Now for a simple one..
What is the simplest config I can use to test PPPoE on a cisco router
for lab purposes..
Maybe term 5 or less devices, just in the lab for testing, training and
pre-deployment op check...

Thoughts?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:56 PM
To: Kevin Graham
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Reasons *not* terminate PPPoE on 7500

;)

Let them do it and hit the first nasty dCEF bug with it and
then find out we will not fix it. They will wish they
didn't try it.

There is an advantage to doing what 90+% of our other
customers do. You are less likely to hit bugs someone else
already hit and we are fixed.

It's the wrong box for PPPoX aggregation. Don't waste your time.

Rodney


On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:16:37PM -0700, Kevin Graham wrote:
> On 6/20/07, Kurt Bales <kwbales at kwbales.net> wrote:
> 
> > What I would like is a somewhat clear and medium-detailed reason to
give the
> > bosses as to why they should be buying 7200's when we already have a
7500
> > here.
> 
> Rodney's weighed in on this a few times before:
> 
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2005-January/016235.html
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2005-January/016203.html
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2006-April/030122.html
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list