[c-nsp] C6503E/SUP32 - full BGP-table?
Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
lists at hojmark.org
Fri Mar 2 18:25:00 EST 2007
> This is unfortunate since we need the space for routes but
> don't have needs for anywhere near the 720Gb/s switching
> performance of the Sup720's.
The problem is, I guess, that they don't save all that much on
the production costs by not including a fabric, so the Sup32 is
likely too expensive compared to the '720 (read 'less margin').
That would leave them with limited incentive to improve it with
more TCAM resources.
-A
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list