[c-nsp] bgp and update-source

Ronald Nsubuga ronald at one2net.co.ug
Thu May 3 10:13:00 EDT 2007


As long as its a point-to-point it wil get the updates and it will use the
physical ip on that interface.

regards

On 4/30/07, Peter Nyamukusa <petern at africaonline.co.sz> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> It would take the physical IP but also remember it would take the primary
> IP
> address on the interface just incase you have any secondary IPs
>
> Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gernot Nusshall
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:09 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] bgp and update-source
>
> hi to all,
>
>
> I´ve got an theoretical question.....if i would have configured on
> FastEthernet 0/0 a standby
> ip and in the bgp routing process:
>
> neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx update-source FastEthernet0/0
>
> Would bgp take the stanby ip or the physical ip of the interface?
>
>
> regards,
>
>
> Gernot
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
rn
---------
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
- -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/
----------------------------------------------


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list