[c-nsp] problem eith EIGRP and BGP

sanju shastri cuteboysanju at gmail.com
Mon May 14 19:13:16 EDT 2007


Hi Phil,

Thx for replying.

The backdoor route feature i have learned is useful when u want to make
MPLS L3 VPN as primary and the alternate link as secondary.but i have a
scenario opposite to it.
in my case L3 VPN would be secondary.

i think i can selectivity change the AD for specific subnets....

Regards,
Sanju


On 5/13/07, Phil Bedard <philxor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Selectively setting the distance or using the backdoor route feature
> in BGP
> may work if you know what routes need to have different distances.
>
> Phil
>
>
> On May 13, 2007, at 4:09 AM, sanju shastri wrote:
>
> > HI all,
> >
> > I have a scenario in which a SP is giving L3 MPLS VPN to client having
> > multiple locations.
> >
> > Now thw client is running EIGRP in his network and EBGP with SP.
> >
> >
> > ON HUB location routes learned by router for remote branches via
> > EIGRP is
> > having an AD of 90 and learnned from EBGP are having a AD of 20.
> > Becasuse of
> > same the EBGP routes are given preference in any case.
> >
> > The client wants to give preference to routeds leaned by local
> > EIGRP and
> > want to make MPLS VPN link as a failover/secondary.
> >
> > well I can change AD for the EBGP session but it will reflected to
> > all the
> > subnet where i want it for some specific subnet.
> >
> > Is there a way around...
> >
> > Regards
> > Sanju
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> Phil Bedard
> philxor at gmail.com
>
>
>
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list