[c-nsp] NTP Support Missing?

[Justin M. Streiner]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Church, Charles wrote:

> 	I've usually found that if NTP is missing, then SNTP is there
> instead.  Granted it's not the same, but I'm guessing they're working in
> the confines of RAM, etc.  I seem to remember the 1600 and 1700s being
> in the same boat.

I've run into the same situation with some of the smaller platforms and 
SNMP support.  Some of the smaller routers seem to have partially 
lobotomized SNMP implementations, presumably to work within memory 
limitations, etc.

I haven't tested this against some of the newer small Cisco boxes to see 
if my findings still hold true.

jms