[c-nsp] [?? Probable Spam] Re: netflow

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Nov 23 04:07:49 EST 2007


Hi,

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:14:16AM +0300, Rivo Tahina RAZAFINDRATSIFA wrote:
> Thanks to all who answered to this question, we are now testing some 
> of these, I would like to know the additional cpu charge due to the 
> use of netflow on the cisco box.

This very much depends on the traffic characteristic (high number of 
short-lived flows vs. long-lived high-volume flows, etc.) and the type of 
box you have (software-forwarding vs. MLS based, vs. PXF vs. ...).

On 7600s, the actual flow collection is done in the hardware ASICs, and
doesn't cause any load - but the actual flow *export* can cause notable
load (>30%) if there is a high number of flows on the box, like "2 Gbit/s
of short-lived HTTP flows" or "single-flow DNS queries" or such.

On software-forwarding platforms, like the 7200, my gut feeling is "add 10%
CPU load for netflow".  But that *will* vary according to traffic mix.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list