[c-nsp] Multicast over VPLS

[alaerte.vidali at nsn.com]

Hi,

I have seen people pointing some disadvantages of H-VPLS. Could you
share your overview of it?

Tks,
Alaerte 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jeff.nsp at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 7:52 AM
To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro); cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Multicast over VPLS

Hi,

Daisy-chained H-VPLS.

Regards,
Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of alaerte.vidali at nsn.com
> Sent: donderdag 29 november 2007 19:30
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Multicast over VPLS
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Any information about what draft Cisco is considering/will adopt to 
> solve bandwidth waste issue with Multicast over VPLS?
> 
> Besides standard, do you see any solution currently available to avoid

> PE to send several flows of the same multicast over a single link on 
> ring topology?
> 
> 
> Topology:
> 
> VPLS between R2/R3/R4/R5
>                                    user     user
>                                      |       |
> Multicast_Server------R1-----R2-----R3-----R4----R5
> 
> By default, R2 will send 3 times the same flow on link R2---R3.
> 
> Tks a lot,
> Alaerte
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/