[c-nsp] Eigrp redistabution of static routes into iBGP

Scott Ingram SIngram at clayton.com
Mon Oct 1 09:02:46 EDT 2007


The route is being advertised from Eigrp
S       63.123.149.37/32 [1/0] via 172.18.44.1
DEN-6509-1#
D EX    63.123.149.37/32 [170/281856] via 172.18.44.2, 2d10h, Vlan44
S*   0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.18.44.254

DEN-7206-1#sh ip route vrf 63.123.149.37
% IP routing table 63.123.149.37 does not exist

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 63.239.161.112/30
                    172.18.44.1         220928         32768 ?



-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboehmer at cisco.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 2:17 AM
To: Scott Ingram; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Eigrp redistabution of static routes into iBGP

Scott Ingram <> wrote on Sunday, September 30, 2007 9:28 PM:

> I'm having an issue with a static route to that wont redistribute
> into my MPLS iBGP.  The local subnet can see the device.  

can you please describe the PE-CE topology, show the VRF/MP-iBGP and
interface configuration, and post "show ip route vrf ... x.x.x.x", "show
ip eigrp vrf ... topology x.x.x.x y.y.y.y" and "show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf
... x.x.x.x"

> Once I do an extended trace from the MPLS serial port it times out.

what do you mean? Which source address are you using? Is this address
reachable from the VRF/CE?

	oli
IMPORTANT NOTICE:

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that we do not consent to any reading, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the transmitted information.



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list