[c-nsp] Verify static route next hop

[Kevin Barrass]

I will try a few more options with the static routing using SLA as
below, Politics are never sensible in my last job I had a fight on every
year to justify Cisco over netgear for our switches :0( is hard to
convince managing directors who never need to have visibility over the
network.

Regards

Kev

-----Original Message-----
From: "steve at ixreach.com"@packetrade.com
[mailto:"steve at ixreach.com"@packetrade.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Wilcox
Sent: 05 October 2007 11:13
To: Kevin Barrass
Cc: Adrian Chadd; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Verify static route next hop

This is one shortcoming of static routing, a 'feature' if you like..

Perhaps this lack of dynamic ability of the statics would help with the
politics as to why routing is sensible? :)

Steve

On 5 Oct 2007, at 07:51, Kevin Barrass wrote:

>
>
> Hi
>
> Cheers for the below iam testing this out now unfortunatly the routers

> and IOS we are using Cisco 2851 12.4(15)T1 BASE IP does not support 
> the track command "track n rtr 1 reachability".
> I have checked our IOS release and according to Cisco Feature 
> Navigator this feature should be supported. But issueing the command 
> track 123 ?
> Gives the below options:
>
> (config)#track 123 ?
>   interface    Select an interface to track
>   ip           IP protocol
>   list         Group objects in a list
>   stub-object  Stub tracking object
>   <cr>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Kev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:adrian at creative.net.au]
> Sent: 05 October 2007 07:13
> To: Kevin Barrass
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Verify static route next hop
>
> What you want is "Reliable Static Routing Backup Using Object 
> Tracking"
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5413/
> products_feature_
> guide09186a00801d862d.html
>
> * setup an SLA to ICMP ECHO ping an IP
> * setup a "tracking object" to track an SLA entry
> * setup a default route to only trigger when that "tracking object" is

> active
>
> Works a treat. Remember that ICMP ECHO to a connected interface might 
> succeed if the connected interface goes down and you can reach the 
> other end via another path. Use source interfaces in your SLA 
> IpIcmpEcho entries and you should be fine.
>
> Adrian
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007, Kevin Barrass wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Iam looking into a problem where we have no option other than to use 
>> static routes for political reasons ;0) Unfortunatly our core network

>> between layer 3 devices is a switched ethernet backbone.
>>
>> The problem we have is that if a next hop of a static route goes down

>> the static route stays valid as the outgoing interface to the next 
>> hop
>
>> is up.
>>
>> I was told that using the command "ip route static adjust-time" there

>> is some internal feature in IOS that checks the availability of the 
>> next hop IP address but in testing this does not work. Can anyone 
>> advise if I have miss read the below document.
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/
>> products_featur
>> e_
>> guide09186a00802801fe.html
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/