[c-nsp] MPLS network on 3750 switches - ISIS or OSPF which isscalable ?

[Tom Zingale (tomz)]

The SDM templates are used for route table sizing.  The total number
listed is approximate number and the number of entries will depend on
mask length and prefixes.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6580/products_configuration_guide_
chapter09186a008087831f.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Zahid Hassan
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:09 PM
> To: Saku Ytti; Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS network on 3750 switches - ISIS or OSPF
which
> isscalable ?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> Does anyone happen to know the routing table size capacity of the ME-
> 3400G
> series ?
> 
> I am wondering if the box will be able to take full BGP table, which I
> very
> much doubt it will be.
> 
> Will be really appreciate any input on this.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> ZH
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Saku Ytti
> Sent: 16 October 2007 14:48
> To: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS network on 3750 switches - ISISor
> OSPFwhichisscalable?
> 
> 
> On (2007-10-16 13:48 +0200), Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> 
> > WS-C3750G-12S-S = 8 k$
> > ME-3400G-12CS-A = 7 k$ (possibly add Metro Access at 1 k$)
> 
> Here 3750 will do L3, 3400 will not. You have to add some
> software there, and only the most expensive will do L3.
> Of course after that license, 3400 would do full IP, while
> 3750 only static and RIP. So direct head-to-head comparison
> is not possible, depending on what you need price difference
> can go either way.
> 
> > Layer 3
> > WS-C3750G-12S-E = 12 k$
> > ME-3400G-12CS-A + Metro IP Access = 10 k$
> >
> > Then add the price of a RPS2300 to the 3750.
> 
> You'd still be missing stackwise and I guess IPv6
> might be relevant to few. But I'll rather take IS-IS
> than IPv6, to be honest.
> 
> --
>   ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/