[c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]

Wed Oct 31 10:00:12 EDT 2007

Hi,
 	Tipical behaviour if TCAM is overflowed. How many TCAM entries you 
have?

Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, david.ponsdesserre at sgcib.com wrote:

> Oupps sorry about that .
>
> This is the log of that specific day .I save you all the boring part but
> does someone knows what does the entry below means ? Does it means " I am
> not able to enable Cef ??????"
>
> ------------------------> Oct 29 06:25:35.486: %C6KFIB-4-DISABLED:
> Hardware FIB forwarding disabled, reverting to only software forwarding.
>
> When i try to do a show ip cef this is what happens :
> sclisgh022#sh ip cef
> %CEF not running
>
> I can't try to enable it during business hour of course.........
>
>
>
> Here is the last system crash report
> ***************************************************
> ******* Information of Last System Crash **********
> ***************************************************
>
>
> Using bootflash:crashinfo.
>
> %Error opening bootflash:crashinfo (File not found)
>
> ***************************************************
> ****** Information of Last System Crash - SP ******
> ***************************************************
>
>
> Using sup-bootflash:crashinfo_20070912-174409.
>
> 00:00:04: %PFREDUN-6-STANDBY: Initializing as STANDBY processor
> 00:00:04: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console
> debugging output.
> 00:00:04: %PFREDUN-6-STANDBY: Initializing as STANDBY processor
> 00:00:04: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure
> console debugging output.
> Firmware compiled 20-Feb-07 14:12 by integ Build [100]
> 00:00:11: %OIR-SP-STDBY-6-CONSOLE: Changing console ownership to route
> processor
> 00:00:11: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure
> console debugging output.
> 00:00:04: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure
> console debugging output.
> Firmware compiled 20-Feb-07 14:12 by integ Build [100]
> 00:00:11: %OIR-SP-STDBY-6-CONSOLE: Changing console ownership to route
> processor
> 00:00:11: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00
> to ensure console debugging output.
> 00:00:55: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Initializing for SSO mode
> 00:00:55: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure
> console debugging output.
> 00:00:11: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00
> to ensure console debugging output.
> 00:00:55: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Initializing for SSO mode
> 00:00:55: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00
> to ensure console debugging output.
> 00:01:12: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Failure of ACTIVE detected, STANDBY
> not ready and reset
> 00:00:55: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00
> to ensure console debugging output.
> 00:01:12: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Failure of ACTIVE detected, STANDBY
> not ready and reset
>
> %Software-forced reload
>
> I though Cef is enable by default on 6500s ? Looks like an harware issue
> to me but you never know !
> Rgds.
> David
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> London Telecom and Network
> Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
> 31/10/07 13:14
>
>
> To
> David PONSDESSERRE/gb/socgen at socgen
> cc
> cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject
> Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +0000, david.ponsdesserre at sgcib.com wrote:
>> Hello list .
>> Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720
>> 3BXL.
>> We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on
> the
>> same time this morning here............................We had to reload
> it
>> to get things back to normal .
>
> Please start a new thread when posting, rather than hijacking others.
>
> I've not seen this specific problem, but you give almost no info so it's
> impossible to tell.
>
> What did the routers log? Did you get any crashinfo files on the RP or
> SP flash?
>
>
>
>>
>> Any inputs are welcome ,
>> Cheers
>> D.
>>
>> David Ponsdesserre
>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> London Telecom and Network
>> Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> *************************************************************************
>> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
> intended solely for the addressee(s).
>> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are
> susceptible to alteration.
>> Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall
> be liable for the message if altered, changed or
>> falsified.
>>                               ************
>> Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont
> confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
>> destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est
> interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration.
>> La SOCIETE GENERALE et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au
> titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.
>>
> *************************************************************************
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>