[c-nsp] 3550 as a BGP Router
Daniel Suchy
ds at nix.cz
Wed Sep 12 12:31:58 EDT 2007
There should be no problem. We had 3550-12G with ~70 BGP sessions on it
in the past (it was used as "router" for internet exchange).
Regards,
Daniel
On 09/12/2007 05:51 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I know BGP on switches has been discussed a lot, and how, yes it is unwise
> from number of routes perspective.
>
> But what I am looking for is setting up a 3550 with about a dozen ISP's
> connected to it.
>
> The ISP's would BGP peer and announce their own routes into it (<100) and
> basically just take each others routes for a neutral peering situation.
>
> Would the 3550 handle that? Number of routes here isn't an issue. but the
> number of BGP sessions. what wise advice would people offer regarding that?
>
> .Skeeve
>
> --
> Skeeve Stevens, RHCE
> skeeve at skeeve.org / www.skeeve.org
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
>
> eintellego - skeeve at eintellego.net - www.eintellego.net
> --
> I'm a groove licked love child king of the verse
> Si vis pacem, para bellum
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
__________________________________________________________________
NIX.CZ z.s.p.o. email: ds at nix.cz
Daniel Suchy, technical specialist tel: +4202 67198350
Nad Elektrarnou 411, Prague 10 fax: +4202 67198349
106 00 Czech Republic http://www.nix.cz
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list