[c-nsp] cap'ing each host/ip to bw limits

[a. rahman isnaini r. sutan]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Greene" <maillist at webjogger.net>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cap'ing each host/ip to bw limits


: We've been using Allot NetEnforcer for years, but have decided to build 
our
: own *nix solution because the hardware and support contract costs are just
: too high with Allot.

Yup, too much money to spend.
My solution last couple years, one allot replaced with up to 10 ETINCs for 
each service gateway we have been running on and the traffic load 
redistributed.

: The Allot is a great product, in my opinion. Just can't afford it!
agree..

:
: Someone mentioned the Ellacoya product line ... I expect these are also
: pretty expensive ... I wonder if anyone could tell us what ballpark 
pricing
: is for the e30 unit ....
:
: Thanks,
: Adam
:
:
: ----- Original Message ----- 
: From: "Steve Muchai" <smuchai at gmail.com>
: To: "Giles Coochey" <gcoochey at sapphire.gi>
: Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
: Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 10:21 AM
: Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cap'ing each host/ip to bw limits
:
:
: > On 9/14/07, Giles Coochey <gcoochey at sapphire.gi> wrote:
: >> >
: >> > Packeteer packet shaper is best....Go for it...
: >> >
: >> >
: >>
: >> Interesting, we've not deployed anything as yet, but others have looked
: >> at Packeteer here and I hear they were not best impressed.
: >>
: >> The next thing we'll probably look at is Allot's Netenforcer product.
: >>
: >> Anyone have any experience with that on this list?
: >>
: >
: > I've worked with all three. My ranking:
: >
: > Packeteer: Ranks lowest, IMHO.
: >
: > ETINC: Great product, great value for money especially the integrated
: > web cache. Their support is great - instant response 24x7. They must
: > be sleep deprived but it doesn't show :-)
: >
: > Allot: The best product I've worked with (luckily, still working with
: > it :-) If you can afford it.
: >
: > For small networks, Mikrotik works pretty well, but I've heard of
: > preformance problems from a friend. Can't exactly recall the details.
: >
: >> Another interesting angle on p2p impact mitigation is to have local
: >> (transparent) p2p caches, anyone have experience with those?
: >
: > Not me.
: > Regards,
: > Steve.
: > _______________________________________________
: > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
: > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
: > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
: >
: >
: >
: >
: >
:
:
:
:
:
: _______________________________________________
: cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
: archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
:
:
: -- 
: No virus found in this incoming message.
: Checked by AVG Free Edition.
: Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.14/999 - Release Date: 9/10/2007 
5:43 PM
:
: