[c-nsp] 1811 vs 2621

[Paul Stewart]

Thanks everyone for your replies.. looks like I can't go wrong...;) 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Duncan Maccubbin
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:58 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 1811 vs 2621



The 1811 (according to Cisco tests) is about 3x faster. The feature
difference between 12.3 and 12.4T is staggering. The 1811 will support new
codes that Cisco brings out as well.



-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org>
>Sent: Sep 18, 2007 12:37 PM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [c-nsp] 1811 vs 2621
>
>Hi folks...
>
>I"m looking at a few sites that we would normally put a 2621 into (not 
>XM) .... if I put a brand new 1811 instead of the 2621 in at these 
>sites am I gaining or losing horsepower?  These routers will be 
>terminating PPPOE sessions as well FYI...
>
>Thanks for your input...
>
>Paul
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/