[c-nsp] ATM + 7505

[Bob Chan]

well you are lucky, but not mine.

My ex-employer deploy many 1401 in distribution layer, for using it ATM25 to
connect wireless backhaul. We found the ATM int. always port up protocol
down, sh/no sh not always help, event if I have backup route to access
it, most of the time, power cycle resume the service.

Most of the case, we have no staff in distribution hub.  ;-)

Finally, all 1401 was replaced by 2620+ATM25 NM

Bob



On 9/21/07, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:17:01AM +0800, Bob Chan wrote:
> > I will keep away from 1401,unless your company have a "weekly equipment
> > reboot" habit
>
> Can't second that.  We had, at maximum, about 100 units deployed in the
> field, and they have been *very* solid - that is: one or two units have
> died in the course of 3-4 years, but besides that, nothing peculiar at
> all.
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
>                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>